Boogieman
Part of things
☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ -- five star failure
Posts: 445
|
|
Dec 22, 2009 11:41:05 GMT
|
for my fenderless-never-gonna-run-hot-rod-project I'm searching for a front end . . with the whole Suspension attached to the crossmember (or the frame-part . .) . . no useless McPherson ;D this would be perfect . . but 3000$ + shipping is a bit steep . . for my low-budget-project . . I was thinking about something like a Lotus-7 frontend (anybody cutting a 7 apart?? . . ;D . .). . or something similar . . it should have disc brakes (size doesn't matter .. the smaller the better . .) . . and be more or less "common" . . so the wohle thing and spare parts doesn't cost a arm and a leg . . any ideas? . .
|
|
Last Edit: Dec 22, 2009 11:42:30 GMT by Boogieman
........
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 22, 2009 11:45:40 GMT
|
I may be talking tosh and if so someone correct me but triumph spitfire?
|
|
Daily: Spazda Mx5
'A52's Fastest steak eater 2010'
|
|
kevfromwales
Posted a lot
the conrod's REALLY out the block now!
Posts: 3,909
|
|
Dec 22, 2009 11:51:40 GMT
|
mk4 / 5 cortina - ugly as fook, but all on it's own x-member
often used on 'budget' rods, but not my choice for a fenderless ride - what is it you're building - if it's narrow / light enough use a ford pop beam axle and transverse spring, can be converted to discs using 105e anglia hubs or some sort of triumph hub setup
- could possibly fabricate tubular arms for a cortina front to slim it down a bit?
hth - kev
|
|
Almost on the road: b11 sunny breadvan, e36 tds, 325i skidcar,
nearly there: ford f250 tathauler, suzuki alto, u11 bluey
not for a while: ford pop, 32 rails,
not in this lifetime: ruby, '29 hillman
''unfortanatly I'm quite old and scruffy and in need of some loving. my drive shaft needs a new boot....''
|
|
Boogieman
Part of things
☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ -- five star failure
Posts: 445
|
|
Dec 22, 2009 11:52:41 GMT
|
well . . first-google pictures of Spitfire front-ends look very promising . . hmm . . but where to get a hold of a spitfire that I can cut in half . . here in central europe?? but it is exactly what I had in mind . .
|
|
........
|
|
|
|
Dec 22, 2009 11:56:32 GMT
|
Should be able to trak some down over here fairly easy.. ROADTRIP!! p.s I'm insanely in love with your dodge
|
|
Last Edit: Dec 22, 2009 11:57:34 GMT by joethefish
Daily: Spazda Mx5
'A52's Fastest steak eater 2010'
|
|
|
|
Dec 22, 2009 11:58:28 GMT
|
Get a Cortina one, copy the A arms in tubes and swap the comedy big springs and shocks for pretty coilovers. That's all those Mustang 2 ones are, anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 22, 2009 12:06:13 GMT
|
get a Cortina one as said above and use it as a jig to make your own better looking one, welded box section looks loads better than the weird shaped pressed steel ford effort, plus easily available in Europe off the taunus
|
|
Volvo back as my main squeeze, more boost and some interior goodies on the way.
|
|
93fxdl
Posted a lot
Enter your message here...
Posts: 2,000
|
|
Dec 22, 2009 13:20:01 GMT
|
|
|
Last Edit: Dec 22, 2009 13:39:19 GMT by 93fxdl
|
|
|
|
Dec 22, 2009 13:22:23 GMT
|
Saab 900 has a double-wishbone setup. New lower wishbones are available after-market for about £30.00 each. The upper ones would have to be restored if you wanted them to look pretty. All the bushings and ball-joints are still available as either standard or Powerflex polly. You would need to build a frame to put between the wishbones as they're usually bolted to the monocoque bodyshell. But I don't really see that as a problem. We adjust the camber and castor by moving the upper wishbone in or out using shims. You would need to build a top mount for the spring or alternately forget about the original spring mount and attach a coil-over unit to the original shock mounting point on the lower wishbone. If you wanted the coil-overs facing forwards then it is easy to reverse the whole setup and keep the steering part for the hubs pointing backwards for a steering rack mounted at the bulkhead. Of course, if you wanted your steering rack mounted in front then that would be possible as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 22, 2009 13:30:38 GMT
|
p.s. - better to get the parts from a 900 made after 1988 produced up to 1993. The hubs use the more common 4x108 PCD for fitting wheels. That includes Ford, Citroen, Peugeot... so you would be spoilt for choice when it comes to chosing the rims.
Also, up until 1988 Saab were still using the front hand brake and some unusual brake calipers. After 1988 they switched to a much more normal setup using very standard ATE calipers. The much bigger calipers from the 9000 are also a direct bolt-on upgrade... although I'd imagine the 900 calipers would be eaisly big enough to stop a small rollerskate type vehicle if that is what you're planning to build.
If you like this idea and need help finding the parts then send me a message.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 22, 2009 13:33:41 GMT
|
|
|
Old Fords never die they just go sideways
|
|
|
|
Dec 22, 2009 13:36:40 GMT
|
I suppose there are a couple of other options for a coil-over mounting as well if not using driveshafts (as I imagine you would not)
1. Fit the coil-over unit to the spring pivot point on the upper wishbone. That's what we do if we want coil-overs. Could tilt it over a bit more so your upper mounting point does not need to be so high up.
2. Fit the coil-over unit through the gap in the upper wishbone and mount it to the middle of the lower wishbone shock mount.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 22, 2009 15:03:24 GMT
|
This man speaks the truth! I don't know how common they are in Europe, but the Mitsubishi L300 is like a DIY hot-rod kit all in a convenient drive-home box. The front end is perfect for mounting to a separate-chassis hot-rod, as is the diff, nice compact pedal box for hot-rod use and even a little under-dash heater/demister system. Basically just change the body, engine/box and chassis and you're away! Here's what the front clip looks like: Edit: Please note that this one has already been modified by a hot rodder, who has fitted a different steering rack (front mount instead of rear) and drop spindles.
|
|
|
|
carmad
Posted a lot
Posts: 2,000
|
|
Dec 22, 2009 15:08:01 GMT
|
I dunno if this is gonna be any good to tou but a vauxhall viva magnum and firenza have them and gaz do coil overs for them heres a pic off mine
|
|
Last Edit: Dec 22, 2009 15:09:09 GMT by carmad
|
|
|
|
Dec 22, 2009 16:44:11 GMT
|
I'd still go with the Saab setup as the wishbones are nice, long and separate and you aren't forced to use a sub-frame supplied with the parts as with the other examples. With the Saab bits you would weld a few bits of box-section together to achieve the frame of the right width for your project. All the alignment is then adjustable so you don't end up with a fixed front-end that accidently went on wonkey and now can't be adjusted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 22, 2009 16:52:59 GMT
|
I'd still go with the Saab setup as the wishbones are nice, long and separate and you aren't forced to use a sub-frame supplied with the parts as with the other examples. With the Saab bits you would weld a few bits of box-section together to achieve the frame of the right width for your project. All the alignment is then adjustable so you don't end up with a fixed front-end that accidently went on wonkey and now can't be adjusted. you don't need a subframe for the Ford vauxhall or mitsubishi front end any more than you do for the saab one, your box section will work just as well on them, and you wouldnt be stuck with the saab stud pattern either, i'd look at the avalability of the kind of wheels ou want and pick a front end thats cheap and has cheap wheels and uprated brakes available for it if building a budget rod, ford would be a good bet in this country for easy upgrades, i don't know vauxhalls but big brakes from much later fords will go on cortina hubs. On a budget build you need to look at things like that saab stuff may be better technically but is it better for this project?
|
|
Volvo back as my main squeeze, more boost and some interior goodies on the way.
|
|
Seth
South East
MorrisOxford TriumphMirald HillmanMinx BorgwardIsabellaCombi
Posts: 15,513
|
|
Dec 22, 2009 18:25:30 GMT
|
MGB? Lots of bolt on off the shelf upgrades available for them.
|
|
Follow your dreams or you might as well be a vegetable.
|
|
|
|
Dec 22, 2009 18:38:28 GMT
|
saab >88 is 4x108, same as Ford
|
|
'98 e36 316i lux '97 mx5 harvard '87 Saab 900 T16s
|
|
Boogieman
Part of things
☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ -- five star failure
Posts: 445
|
|
Dec 22, 2009 19:34:34 GMT
|
thanks for all the input . . I have to say the L300 option is probably the one which is the most available here and I'm tempted to just buy one right away ;D . . . the Saab parts really looks nice . . but I'm not sure if a "subframe" isn't the easier oprtion . . . .
keep em coming ;D
|
|
Last Edit: Dec 22, 2009 19:40:27 GMT by Boogieman
........
|
|
Boogieman
Part of things
☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ -- five star failure
Posts: 445
|
|
Dec 23, 2009 11:15:34 GMT
|
after a bit of thinking . . .
The Volvo- is the shock-mount stront enough to be the mounting point for a coil over?? . . most of the stress in the stock configuration is on the top whisbone . . transfered by the spring . .
The Mitsu- what years of the L300 do have this front clip? . . 1st or 2nd gen? . . or both?
Vauxhall: is there a Opel-Version of the Viva??
|
|
........
|
|
|