markbognor
South East
Posts: 9,970
Club RR Member Number: 56
|
|
Mar 11, 2013 20:31:52 GMT
|
|
|
Last Edit: Mar 11, 2013 20:33:05 GMT by markbognor
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 11, 2013 20:59:03 GMT
|
The most talked about car in the states right now and the most important car built in years.
|
|
|
|
qwerty
Club Retro Rides Member
Posts: 2,419
Club RR Member Number: 52
|
|
Mar 11, 2013 21:06:26 GMT
|
I love how the nostalgia rods are working through the decades!
|
|
|
|
unitybonez
Part of things
Blowing Pintos
Posts: 870
|
|
Mar 11, 2013 22:11:36 GMT
|
Not my kind of stuff really, but the attention to detail is mindblowin. If you take a black n white shot and photoshop it on a old small book from the 60s no one is gonna know the diffrence. Rather bad ass i say.
|
|
Sent from my ouiji board.
|
|
mylittletony
Posted a lot
Posts: 2,406
Club RR Member Number: 84
|
|
Mar 12, 2013 12:06:41 GMT
|
that paint job...
stunning
|
|
|
|
stealthstylz
Club Retro Rides Member
Posts: 14,953
Club RR Member Number: 174
|
|
Mar 12, 2013 12:34:42 GMT
|
Love that paint. I sold my sidepipes to a guy who's gonna build a bit of a game changer re:nostalgia rods. Can't wait to see it out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2013 12:51:41 GMT
|
I love how the nostalgia rods are working through the decades! I'm looking forward to the resurrection of Mini-trucking* I do enjoy some show rods, would love to see them driving this around with that firewall though. Interesting stuff. *yes yes I know it never really died
|
|
Last Edit: Mar 12, 2013 12:58:57 GMT by HoTWire
|
|
Seth
South East
MorrisOxford TriumphMirald HillmanMinx BorgwardIsabellaCombi
Posts: 15,542
|
|
Mar 12, 2013 12:53:26 GMT
|
I've come back to look at this several times. Pretty speechless really. I never thought I'd see a set of those chrome steel slots on a show car but they and so much of it are just so perfectly suited. Several things are slightly oddball but they work for the period and sort of thing it's representing.
|
|
Follow your dreams or you might as well be a vegetable.
|
|
Dez
Club Retro Rides Member
And I won't sit down. And I won't shut up. And most of all I will not grow up.
Posts: 11,790
Club RR Member Number: 34
|
|
Mar 12, 2013 13:38:04 GMT
|
i like the paint, but not on that car. i really don't think paintjob like that work on anything that isnt a chicano lowrider/bomb. and especially not on a rod, 60s show rod or not. it clashes with the lines of the car and is overly fussy, detracting from a lot of the mods going on. the fact the panelwork on the decklid totally ignores the louvers actually really annoys me, makes em look like a total afterthought. paint it plain bright red and itll look a whole load better, esp. with the white chassis. tail lights look curse word as well, even moving them out towards the edge would make em look 100% better. theres some nice touches on the rest of it though.
|
|
|
|
unitybonez
Part of things
Blowing Pintos
Posts: 870
|
|
Mar 12, 2013 14:36:54 GMT
|
historically speaking, in the late 60s and troughout the 70s and early 80s, hot rods, muscle cars, street machines, street freaks, gassers.....etc...etc...all used to be painted with crazy psychedelic panel paint themes. 60s Kustom cars/early Lowriders, werent the only ones with intricate panel jobs, they simply are the only crowd that kept doin it.
There is a lot of photographic proof out there if for some reason you don't believe me.
|
|
Sent from my ouiji board.
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2013 15:53:22 GMT
|
Love it appart from for some reason i think it needs some oddball style of headlights?
Maybe woodlight style? and painted the same way..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2013 20:24:39 GMT
|
I like the paint, but not on that car. I really don't think paintjob like that work on anything that isnt a chicano lowrider/bomb. and especially not on a rod, 60s show rod or not. it clashes with the lines of the car and is overly fussy, detracting from a lot of the mods going on. the fact the panelwork on the decklid totally ignores the louvers actually really annoys me, makes em look like a total afterthought. paint it plain bright red and itll look a whole load better, esp. with the white chassis. tail lights look curse word as well, even moving them out towards the edge would make em look 100% better. theres some nice touches on the rest of it though. You disappoint me Dez. Usually me and you see eye to eye and seem to have similar tastes. Couldn't disagree more with that ^^^ though! Ah well, I think it's killer, good to have a car that divides opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2013 21:01:25 GMT
|
I really like this specially the paint and as mentioned the style of paint was used on many different vehicles thru the 'crazy paint' era. I don't like the rear lights. And the last shot looks like it could be model kit from back in the day
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 13, 2013 21:14:22 GMT
|
I really like that. I agree with Dez in that the louvres look like an afterthought and I'm not keen on the rear lights either, but I love the whole OTT show aspect of it and there are some lovely details, especially in the photos in some of the links posted. The paintwork on the underside of the body, the pin striping around the lace and fogged panels and, oddly the narrow red pinstripe on the whitebands are particular favourite bits. The chrome and diamond pleating everywhere is just lovely
|
|
1989 Peugeot 205. You know, the one that was parked in a ditch on the campsite at RRG'17... the glass is always full. but the ratio of air to water may vary.
|
|
|
|
Mar 15, 2013 22:24:45 GMT
|
I love the blue perspex hood sides! Now that's old-school!
|
|
|
|
bortaf
Posted a lot
Posts: 4,549
|
|
|
I like the paint, but not on that car. I really don't think paintjob like that work on anything that isnt a chicano lowrider/bomb. and especially not on a rod, 60s show rod or not. it clashes with the lines of the car and is overly fussy, detracting from a lot of the mods going on. the fact the panelwork on the decklid totally ignores the louvers actually really annoys me, makes em look like a total afterthought. paint it plain bright red and itll look a whole load better, esp. with the white chassis. tail lights look curse word as well, even moving them out towards the edge would make em look 100% better. theres some nice touches on the rest of it though. /\ this /\ pretty much word for word Overly fussy is very apt phrase IMHO i'm affraid
|
|
R.I.P photobucket
|
|
markbognor
South East
Posts: 9,970
Club RR Member Number: 56
|
|
Mar 16, 2013 19:58:33 GMT
|
I'm very much in the - trunk lid and rear lights could work better - camp. But neither can be seen from here: Which more than makes up for any slight imperfections I may think it has.
|
|
Last Edit: Mar 16, 2013 19:59:50 GMT by markbognor
|
|
Seth
South East
MorrisOxford TriumphMirald HillmanMinx BorgwardIsabellaCombi
Posts: 15,542
|
|
Mar 16, 2013 20:11:09 GMT
|
You see, I'm sat here pretending its about 1963 and that someone with a '34 coupe race car has decided to build it into a show car for the upcoming winter indoor show season. He's made it all pretty, panelling in the open hood sides with blue plexiglass to match the plastic already in the windows from its C/Gas days. Then he's panel painted it in the current fashionable style to attract the judges attention. Yeah, it had a louvered decklid but that's what he had to work with as it was a race car. He's got to put some tailights on it too and likes the Pontiac ones, knowing that they look best on a street car when there's a pair of them each towards the outside edges of the rear pan. But this is a show car! I'm gonna have four of them all in a line! Ha! The judges won't have seen that before!
|
|
Follow your dreams or you might as well be a vegetable.
|
|
|
|
Mar 16, 2013 22:53:56 GMT
|
I'm with Seth about that rear end, I actually like that it's not all conventional and perfect but that it has some character and true oddity about it. This is a modern build that doesn't look modern and is 100% LOOK-AT-ME which I absolutely love about hot rods. Paint it plain red and move the rear lights as Dez suggests and I doubt I'd look at it twice, writing it off as just another hot rod Ford.
|
|
|
|
unitybonez
Part of things
Blowing Pintos
Posts: 870
|
|
|
Yeah, Seth pretty much nailed it. And I'm sure thats what the owner had in mind.
|
|
Sent from my ouiji board.
|
|
|