rod
Posted a lot
Posts: 1,953
|
|
Dec 18, 2008 14:37:52 GMT
|
Hi All I'm contemplating getting a van in place of my car.Was wondering about the increases in road fund licence that were talked about a few months back,and how it will affect vans . Anyone know the amounts/cc/weight etc ?? thanks.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 18, 2008 14:41:58 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 18, 2008 14:43:54 GMT
|
Aren't all the changes 'on hold' as a result of the economy being parped and another retrospective tax would be a surefire election-loser?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 18, 2008 14:50:54 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 18, 2008 14:58:43 GMT
|
The original plans are on hold - well, reduced. All for post-2001 stuff only, so not really retro things. That'll just be as before.
|
|
1986 Citroen 2CV Dolly Other things. Check out my Blog for the latest! www.hubnut.org
|
|
|
|
Dec 18, 2008 15:35:06 GMT
|
Looking at that report from whatcar, post 2001 stuff left alone for now, post 2006 stuff getting nailed to the cross as planet killing child molesting chicken raping terrorist weapons of mass destruction, as planned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 18, 2008 15:43:46 GMT
|
...and yet the Government is thinking about bailing out Land Rover/Jaguar, who produce vehicles in the higher emissions range.
If they really wanted to dissuade people from buying higher emission cars, surely the best way would be to aloow manufacturers of such cars to disappear! Oh, wait, its not about the Environment at all, is it!
Why should the taxpayer even bail them out, seeing as parent company Tata is sponsoring Ferrari in the 2009 F1GP?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 18, 2008 15:44:32 GMT
|
we got new combo vans at work with the 1300 diesel engine
they're still 185 a year tax not 120 as would be if it was a normal corsa
|
|
2001 HONDA CT110 (NOT RCV)
|
|
|
|
Dec 18, 2008 15:46:13 GMT
|
This week, multi-billion £ bailout to save jobs.
Next week, they close the factory anyway and flounce off with the money.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 18, 2008 16:09:03 GMT
|
...and yet the Government is thinking about bailing out Land Rover/Jaguar, who produce vehicles in the higher emissions range. If they really wanted to dissuade people from buying higher emission cars, surely the best way would be to aloow manufacturers of such cars to disappear! Oh, wait, its not about the Environment at all, is it! Absolutely! Excellent point.
|
|
|
|
|
rod
Posted a lot
Posts: 1,953
|
|
Dec 18, 2008 17:18:30 GMT
|
So if these rules they are suggesting are for cars reg'd after 2001,I wonder what they have in store later on for the pre 2001 stuff ? And why did they choose 2001 as the base line?
|
|
Last Edit: Dec 18, 2008 17:20:01 GMT by rod
|
|
|
|
Dec 18, 2008 17:34:38 GMT
|
2001 is the baseline beacuse that's when the CO2-based banded tax regime was introduced. AFAIK, they can't easily change the pre-2001 legislation, but they are planning on increasing the current over 1.5L tax band by about £15.
James
|
|
|
|
rod
Posted a lot
Posts: 1,953
|
|
Dec 18, 2008 17:51:22 GMT
|
Eventually ,we'll all be on a slippery slope ,I reckon!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 18, 2008 19:00:43 GMT
|
The more they try and tax me away from big gas guzzlers the more i'm determined to keep one, i'm so sad.
|
|
Volvo back as my main squeeze, more boost and some interior goodies on the way.
|
|
|
|
Dec 18, 2008 19:09:53 GMT
|
All our vans are £185 and Private Light Goods, all pre 2001 (pre 1988 actually), unless they are pre 1973, and therefore the tax is FREE! There is no way of taxing Mk1 and Mk2 transits by the C02 they emit, as it isn't registered from new at the DVLA.
|
|
|
|
murran
Part of things
Posts: 610
|
|
Dec 18, 2008 19:42:38 GMT
|
we'll all get taxed off the road at some point.
|
|
|
|